Free Da 2166 9 1 PDF Template

When filling out and using the DA 2166-9-1 form, consider the following key takeaways:

• Accuracy is crucial. Ensure all personal information, including name, SSN, and rank, is correct to avoid delays.
• Understand the purpose. This form is primarily used for evaluating the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs).
• Follow the guidelines. Refer to AR 623-3 and DA PAM 623-3 for specific instructions and requirements.
• Complete all sections. Every part of the form must be filled out completely to ensure a comprehensive evaluation.
• Use clear language. When describing duties and performance, be straightforward and specific to convey your message effectively.
• Consult the Privacy Act Statement. Familiarize yourself with the privacy implications of the information you are providing.
• Signature implications. Signing the form does not indicate agreement with the evaluation, but confirms that the administrative data is accurate.
• Be mindful of timelines. Pay attention to the dates required for submission and ensure timely completion.
• Communicate with evaluators. Maintain open lines of communication with the rater and senior rater for any clarifications needed.
• Prepare for potential appeals. Be aware of the appeals process outlined in AR 623-3 should you disagree with the evaluations.

By keeping these points in mind, you can ensure a smoother experience when filling out and utilizing the DA 2166-9-1 form.

The DA Form 2166-9-1, known as the NCO Evaluation Report for Sergeants, shares similarities with the DA Form 67-9, which is the Officer Evaluation Report. Both forms serve the purpose of evaluating the performance and potential of military personnel. Each document includes sections for administrative data, performance assessments, and the signatures of raters and senior raters. Furthermore, both forms emphasize the importance of providing constructive feedback and identifying areas for improvement, ensuring that evaluations are comprehensive and reflective of the individual’s contributions to their unit.

Another document akin to the DA Form 2166-9-1 is the DA Form 4856, which is the Developmental Counseling Form. This form is utilized for documenting counseling sessions between leaders and subordinates. Like the NCO Evaluation Report, it includes sections for identifying strengths and weaknesses, as well as setting goals for future performance. The focus on personal development and mentorship is a common theme, fostering an environment where soldiers can grow and succeed in their roles.

The DA Form 1059, the Academic Evaluation Report, is also similar in its evaluative nature. This form is used to assess the performance of soldiers during formal training courses. It captures information about the soldier’s academic achievements and overall conduct, much like the DA Form 2166-9-1 assesses an NCO's performance in their assigned duties. Both forms require the input of evaluators who provide feedback on the individual’s competencies and areas for improvement.

In addition, the DA Form 2166-9-2, which is the NCO Evaluation Report for Staff Sergeants and above, parallels the DA Form 2166-9-1 in structure and purpose. Both documents are designed to evaluate the performance and potential of non-commissioned officers, albeit at different ranks. They share common sections for administrative data, performance evaluations, and rater comments, highlighting the importance of consistent evaluation criteria across different levels of leadership within the Army.

For those considering a prenuptial agreement, it is essential to understand the legal implications and financial arrangements that such a document entails. This agreement, designed to outline asset ownership and division in the event of divorce or death, exemplifies a proactive approach to financial planning in marriage. Couples can benefit from clarity in their financial expectations, thereby reducing potential conflicts in the future. Resources for creating a prenuptial agreement can be found at https://floridaformspdf.com, which provides necessary forms and guidance for navigating this important legal matter.

The DA Form 67-10, the Officer Evaluation Report for Captains and above, bears resemblance to the NCO Evaluation Report as well. It evaluates the performance of commissioned officers and includes similar sections for administrative data, performance assessments, and rater feedback. The focus on leadership qualities and potential for future assignments is a consistent theme in both forms, ensuring that evaluations are aligned with the Army’s objectives for personnel development.

Another related document is the DA Form 638, which is the Recommendation for Award. While its primary purpose is to recommend soldiers for awards based on their performance, it also requires detailed descriptions of the individual’s contributions and achievements. This emphasis on recognizing outstanding performance aligns with the goals of the DA Form 2166-9-1, which seeks to provide a thorough assessment of an NCO’s capabilities and accomplishments.

The DA Form 750, the Performance Evaluation of Civilian Employees, shares a similar purpose with the NCO Evaluation Report, though it is tailored for civilian personnel. Both forms aim to assess performance, set expectations, and provide feedback for improvement. The structure of each document includes sections for performance ratings and comments, ensuring that evaluations are fair and constructive across both military and civilian personnel.

Additionally, the DA Form 1559, the Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) Referral, is comparable in its evaluative aspect. This form documents referrals for substance abuse issues and includes sections for assessments and recommendations. While the focus differs, both forms aim to identify areas of concern and facilitate improvement, highlighting the Army’s commitment to the well-being of its personnel.

Lastly, the DA Form 2807-1, the Report of Medical History, is somewhat similar in that it provides a comprehensive overview of an individual’s medical background. While its focus is on health rather than performance, both forms require detailed information and aim to ensure that personnel are fit for duty. The thoroughness and attention to detail required in each document reflect the Army's commitment to maintaining high standards for its members.

How to Use Da 2166 9 1

Completing the DA 2166-9-1 form is an important step in the evaluation process for NCOs. This form requires accurate information about the rated NCO, their rater, and their senior rater. Following these steps will help ensure that the form is filled out correctly.

1. Begin with Part I - Administrative Data. Fill in the rated NCO's name (last, first, middle initial), SSN or DOD ID number, rank, date of rank, PMOSC, unit, organization, station, ZIP code or APO, major command, status code, UIC, reason for submission, and the period covered (from and through).
2. In the same section, indicate the rated months, nonrated codes, number of enclosures, and the rated NCO's email address.
3. Move to Part II - Authentication. Fill in the name, SSN or DOD ID number, signature, date, rank, PMOSC/branch, organization, and duty assignment for the rater. Include the rater's email address.
4. Next, provide the same information for the senior rater, including their name, SSN or DOD ID number, signature, date, rank, PMOSC/branch, organization, and duty assignment. Don’t forget the senior rater's email address.
5. If applicable, fill in the supplementary reviewer’s information, including their name, rank, PMOSC/organization, and whether a review is required. Add comments, signature, date, and email address.
6. In the rated NCO section, indicate counseling dates and the rated NCO's signature and date.
7. Proceed to Part III - Duty Description. Enter the principal duty title, duty MOSC, daily duties and scope, areas of special emphasis, and appointed duties.
8. Next, complete Part IV - Performance Evaluation. Start with the APFT results, including pass/fail/profile date, height, weight, and whether the rated NCO is within standard.
9. Evaluate character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. Provide comments for each section, indicating whether the rated NCO met or did not meet the standard.
10. In Part V - Senior Rater Overall Potential, select the appropriate box representing the rated NCO's potential and provide comments. List two successive assignments and one broadening assignment.

Once you have filled out all sections, double-check for accuracy and completeness. Ensure that all signatures are obtained before submitting the form. This will help in maintaining the integrity of the evaluation process.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is a critical document for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the Army. It helps provide a structured assessment of an NCO’s performance and potential. Along with this form, several other documents are commonly used to ensure a comprehensive evaluation process. Below is a list of these documents, along with a brief description of each.

• DA Form 2166-9: This is the NCO Evaluation Report that covers a broader range of ranks. It provides a summary of an NCO's performance over a specified period, including comments from raters and senior raters.
• DA Form 4856: Known as the Developmental Counseling Form, this document is used to record counseling sessions between leaders and soldiers. It helps track performance and development needs.
• DA Form 705: This form records the results of the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). It is essential for evaluating an NCO’s physical readiness and adherence to Army standards.
• DA Form 5500/5501: These forms are used for recording body fat measurements. They are necessary for ensuring compliance with Army weight standards.
• DA Form 2028: This is the Recommended Changes to Publications form. It allows soldiers to suggest changes or updates to Army publications, including evaluation forms.
• NCOER Support Form: This form helps NCOs and their raters track performance objectives and goals. It serves as a guide for completing the evaluation report.
• California Employment Verification Form: This document plays a crucial role in confirming employment history and status, particularly for various processes such as background checks and loan applications. For more information, refer to https://templates-guide.com/california-employment-verification-template/.
• DA Form 11-2: This is the Army Regulation Compliance Checklist. It ensures that all required documentation and regulations are followed during the evaluation process.

These forms and documents work together to create a thorough evaluation process for NCOs. They help ensure that assessments are fair, comprehensive, and in line with Army standards. Understanding each document's purpose can greatly enhance the evaluation experience for both raters and rated NCOs.

1. Incorrect Personal Information: Many individuals fail to provide accurate personal details, such as their full name, Social Security Number (SSN), or DOD ID Number. This can lead to significant delays in processing the evaluation report.

2. Missing Dates: It is crucial to include specific dates for the period covered by the evaluation. Omitting these dates can create confusion about the evaluation timeline and may result in the form being returned for correction.

3. Improper Email Addresses: Using personal email addresses instead of the required .gov or .mil addresses for the rater, senior rater, and supplementary reviewer can cause communication issues. Always ensure that the correct email format is used.

4. Failure to Sign: Some individuals neglect to sign the form, particularly in the RATED NCO section. A signature is necessary to confirm that the individual has reviewed the report and agrees that the administrative data is accurate.

5. Incomplete Duty Description: The duty description section must be filled out thoroughly. Leaving out important details about daily duties, areas of special emphasis, or appointed duties can lead to misunderstandings about the NCO's role and performance.

6. Neglecting Comments: Providing insufficient or vague comments in the evaluation sections can weaken the report. Clear, specific feedback is essential for a comprehensive evaluation of the NCO's performance and potential.

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, it is important to follow certain guidelines to ensure accuracy and completeness. Here are seven things you should and shouldn’t do:

• Do double-check all personal information for accuracy.
• Don’t leave any sections blank unless specifically instructed to do so.
• Do use clear and concise language when describing duties and responsibilities.
• Don’t use abbreviations that may not be understood by all readers.
• Do ensure that all signatures are obtained before submission.
• Don’t forget to include any necessary attachments or enclosures.
• Do review the completed form with a trusted colleague for additional feedback.